When union members vote on a proposed contract, there is more at stake than just wages. A collective bargaining agreement can shape everything from benefits and overtime to scheduling, workplace safety, job protections, and how disputes are handled. So what happens when members review a proposed agreement and decide it doesn't go far enough?
They can vote no.
But what happens next? In many cases, the bargaining parties return to the negotiating table to work toward an agreement that members are willing to accept. Understanding how this process works can help union members make informed decisions about the agreements that shape their working lives.
Before members vote on a new contract, union negotiators and the employer generally negotiate the terms of a proposed agreement. If the bargaining teams reach a tentative agreement, often called a TA, the proposal can then be presented to union members for ratification, depending on the union's rules and the agreement's terms.
The tentative agreement may address:
A tentative agreement is not necessarily the final contract. If membership ratification is required, members have the opportunity to accept or reject the proposal. That vote is an important part of collective bargaining because the people covered by the agreement have a voice in whether the proposed terms are acceptable.
There isn't one reason members vote against a tentative agreement. Every bargaining unit has different priorities, and what matters most can depend on members' jobs, working conditions, seniority, and the issues that came up during negotiations.
Members may believe the proposed wage increases do not keep up with inflation or the cost of living. They may have concerns about health insurance, retirement benefits, overtime, scheduling, layoffs, subcontracting, job security, or other provisions. Sometimes the issue is not a single provision at all. Members may believe the overall package does not adequately reflect what they expected after months of negotiations.
For members, a contract vote is an opportunity to weigh the full agreement and decide whether the proposed terms meet their needs.
The next step is usually more bargaining. The union and employer can return to negotiations and attempt to resolve the issues that led to the rejection.
That could mean:
The process does not always move in a straight line. Negotiations may involve multiple proposals, additional discussions, or changes to different parts of the agreement before the parties reach a deal that can move forward.
There is also no universal timeline for how quickly this process happens. In some cases, the parties reach a revised agreement relatively quickly. In others, negotiations can continue for weeks or months.
A contract rejection and a strike authorization vote are two different things. Understanding the distinction is important because rejecting a proposed agreement does not, by itself, authorize a strike.
A contract rejection means union members have voted not to approve the proposed agreement. It does not, by itself, authorize a strike or require workers to stop working. Instead, what happens next depends on the circumstances of the negotiations, the union's rules, and the terms of the existing agreement.
A strike authorization vote, on the other hand, asks members whether they are willing to give union leadership the authority to call a strike if negotiations reach an impasse or other circumstances warrant a work stoppage. Authorizing a strike does not necessarily mean a strike will happen. Negotiations can continue after a strike authorization vote, and the parties may reach an agreement before a strike takes place.
In simple terms, the two votes answer different questions:
Contract rejection: “Do we accept this proposed agreement?”
Strike authorization: “Do we authorize our union to call a strike if negotiations cannot reach an acceptable agreement?”
A union may hold these votes at different points in the bargaining process, depending on its rules and the circumstances of the negotiations. The important takeaway is that neither vote automatically leads to a strike. Negotiations can continue while both sides evaluate their next steps.
The answer depends on the circumstances and the terms of the existing agreement. In many cases, workers continue working under the existing terms while the union and employer negotiate a new agreement.
When an existing collective bargaining agreement expires, Section 8(d) of the National Labor Relations Act generally requires the parties to continue bargaining in good faith for a successor agreement. In many circumstances, the terms of the expired agreement continue to apply while negotiations continue.
This means that a rejected contract does not necessarily create an immediate change in a worker's wages, benefits, schedule, or other working conditions. The existing agreement and applicable labor law can determine what remains in place while the parties negotiate.
However, labor law is complex, and the rules can vary depending on the situation, industry, contract language, and whether other legal issues are involved. Not every provision of an expired agreement necessarily continues indefinitely, and certain employer actions may be subject to additional legal requirements.
Union members should look to their union representatives and the terms of their existing agreement for information about what applies to their particular bargaining unit.
Collective bargaining is not simply a negotiation between an employer and a handful of union representatives. Union bargaining teams negotiate on behalf of the membership, but where ratification is required, members ultimately have a voice in whether the proposed agreement is accepted. That means a contract vote gives workers an opportunity to evaluate the terms that could govern their working lives for years.
A "no" vote can communicate that members believe more needs to be negotiated. It can also give bargaining teams a clearer understanding of what their members are willing—or unwilling—to accept.
A contract is much more than the headline wage increase. Before voting, members may want to review the entire proposal and understand how changes could affect their day-to-day work.
Important questions can include:
Understanding the entire agreement can be just as important as focusing on the wage number highlighted during negotiations.
Contract negotiations are rarely simple. Employers have their priorities, union negotiators have their priorities, and union members ultimately have to decide whether the proposed agreement meets their expectations. A contract vote gives members a meaningful role in that process. Whether they vote yes or no, their decision can help communicate what they believe is acceptable and what may need further attention.
For union members, understanding the bargaining process can make it easier to evaluate a proposed agreement and understand the significance of their vote. At ULA Network, we connect workers and the labor community with information designed to Support, Educate, and Promote.
Explore ULA Network's resources to learn more about the union workforce and the organizations that support workers' rights.